Bob Rosenblatt, Academy senior fellow and former Los Angeles Times Washington correspondent will report on the people and the maneuvers that led to this major expansion of social insurance.
The aging of the U. As is true across the country, in our state of Nebraska baby boomers represent the largest birth cohort, projected to grow the state's and-older population to nearlyby The proportion of older Nebraskans within the state's overall population is also growing because other demographic changes, such as birth rates and immigration, are not projected to keep pace with the aging of the state's residents.
Consequently, legislators and other policy-makers are becoming increasingly concerned about the fiscal consequences of population aging. Some of the impacts are already well known.
In the United States, baby boomers are becoming eligible for Social Security and Medicare and will produce unprecedented strains on these programs, particularly over the next two decades.
Additionally, since Medicare does not meet all health-care expenses, particularly long-term care costs, older Americans will pay higher out-of-pocket costs for these services and will increasingly rely upon Medicaid when they can no longer meet these expenses.
In a state like Nebraska with an already large older population, the specter of future Medicaid long-term care costs looms quite large.
Nonetheless, the continued upward spiraling of Medicaid long-term care costs is not inevitable. Today, the highest Medicaid costs for long-term care derive from care provided by skilled-nursing facilities.
However, nursing-home placement, while necessary for some individuals who require skilled nursing assistance 24 hours a day, seven days a week, is not needed by everyone who receives long-term care.
The most effective way to save Medicaid costs is to delay or prevent unnecessary nursing-home placement. Assisted-living facilities are not required to provide the professional staffing needed by residents with clinical diagnoses such as dementia; in addition, most do not provide personal-care assistance for activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, feeding and toileting.
Further, the supply of assisted-living facilities in rural states like Nebraska is limited. And assisted living is expensive to families, since most of these facilities do not accept Medicaid. For these reasons, the most effective way to lower long-term care costs, and to delay or prevent nursing-home placement, is through home and community based services HCBS.
Community-based services, such as adult day care, cost one-quarter of the expenses for nursing home care.
For many older Nebraskans, HCBS are already available, particularly for those in metropolitan areas who can afford to pay for services out-of-pocket. The best option for lowering long-term-care costs is to expand lower-cost HCBS in the public sector.
This includes working in continued partnership with Area Agencies on Aging, which receive federal funding under the Older Americans Act to provide services such as nutrition, transportation and care management. Although the demand for long-term-care services among older Americans will continue to increase over the next two decades, this does not necessarily require a corresponding increase in costs to states.
The key lies in the ability of state policy-makers, working with providers in both the public and private sectors, to delay or prevent unnecessary nursing-home placement through the expansion of more affordable alternatives, specifically HCBS.
The greater availability of these options will enable states to meet their long-term care challenges in a way that provides more choices for our seniors and is economically sustainable.
Kelly is an associate professor in the Department of Gerontology at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. This commentary is based on a policy brief prepared in December by the authors for the Nebraska Legislative Planning Committee. VOICES is curated by the Governing Institute, which seeks out practitioners and observers whose perspective and insight add to the public conversation about state and local government.
For more information or to submit an article to be considered for publication, please contact editor John Martin.Over half of homeowners in the U.S. are now 55 and older.
And this figure is only going to grow over time. In places like California, the Taco Tuesday baby boomers own the housing market.. This is just a fact and has kept inventory to a very low level. Analysis of the Long-Term Costs of the Administration’s Goals for the Military. CBO’s Economic Forecasting Record: Update.
Potential Spending on Veterans’ Health Care, – November 19, Labor Force Experiences of Recent Veterans. November 19, The Increasing Costs of the Department of rutadeltambor.com://rutadeltambor.com Both of these programs pay for long-term care for people who are poor and chronically or terminally ill.
But nursing homes have long lost money on residents covered by Medicaid programs. Aging baby boomers and the rising cost of chronic back pain: secular trend analysis of longitudinal Medical Expenditures Panel Survey data for years to Costs and cost analysis, Aging, Spine, Economics, Chronic disease.
Long-term US live birth trends from to Live birth trends in to are based on adjusted rutadeltambor.com · Regardless of their longer life expectancy, baby boomers were more likely to have higher rates of hypertension, higher cholesterol, obesity and diabetes.
2 These results indicate that seniors will push the cost of health care higher and increase the need for health care professionals as the boomers rutadeltambor.com · THE HEALTH OF AMERICA’S BABY BOOM GENERATION, long linked with concerns about labor force participation, disability and higher acute and long-term care costs.
Compared to cohorts that preceded them, the boomers baby boomers (born ) to older cohorts (bornrutadeltambor.com